The Leaders We Deserve Bad Idea Award goes to the BBC’s Newsnight programme and its Tower of Westminster representation of the current BREXIT situation.
This week, the annual much-prized bad sex award was won by the novelist James Frey (He faced stiff competition, as the Sunday Times stated, tongue in cheek).
The publicity for the award inspired me to create Leaders we deserve bad idea award, which will be made from time to time, as I come across a promising crop of contenders.
This week is one such a time. The spotlight is very much on our political representatives and media commentators in the UK, in their efforts to deal with the nightmare known as Brexit. I could have taken a wider bad idea, such as Brexit itself, but that would take far too long to unpack and examine fruitfully.
As I write, our representatives are half way through forty hours of the time allocated to the proposed method by which the UK will exit the European Union.So my examples are of simpler ideas more typical of case examples often examined within LWD posts and used to illustrate leadership dilemmas.
No such thing as a bad idea
Former students of mine still loyal to LWD, will remember my insistence that there is no such thing as a bad idea, only ideas requiring a further act of creativity before their merits become clear.
I mention this to suggest that my nominated ideas for the new award are indeed further examples ideas in need of a bit more imaginative effort rather than complete rejection.
The four candidate ideas
My four candidates all come from one of our national institutions, the BBC. Three are from Radio Five. This reflects my listening and viewing habits and admiration for ‘Auntie’ rather than evidence of its terminal decline.
On, then to the four candidates.
1 An MP talks on air to a voter
The presenters of the radio five live morning show announce breathlessly a first, namely an innovation in radio broadcasting: An MP is to take part live in a discussion with a voter.Wow. This pitch for the idea did not quite convey to me the excitement it was producing in its advocates. Then the first on-air outing of the idea. Others are planned in subsequent days. Maybe I didn’t try hard enough, but I couldn’t see what was ‘the difference that made a difference’ in the little question and answer which followed.
2 The good week bad week discussion
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04gvzmf On the Peter Allen evening current affairs programme, pundits discuss news issues of the week. After each topic, the panellists rate the item either as contributing to a good week or a bad week. There is usually confusion over what this can possibly mean. The format has survived several years (or it seems to me) without attempts to improve on its vacuous nature.
3 The backbencher of the week award.
Each Sunday morning, Pienaar’s politics presents The backbencher of the week award. An MP appears and receives the metaphorical award. John Pienaar presents the award with heavy irony implying that ‘this prestigious award’ is all a clever joke shared by each recipient.
4 The cardboard tower of Westminster
This is an innovation introduced this week [December 2018] on Newsnight, (arguably the BBC’s flagship political TV programme, which airs nightly). Various ways of adding interest to panel discussions have been tried in recent months, as the Brexit story unfolds. In the nominated idea, the assorted pundits are invited to stand before a cardboard cutout of the tower of Westminster and stick on it graphics of key individuals and political groupings. The most influential entities are placed higher up the tower.
And the winner is?
The winner is based on the criteria the voters choose to use.
In everyday discussions these can be finely analysed or based on individual or collective feelings. But closure is soothing thing. I have chosen my winner as a starting point for further comments and alternative views.
For me (and in the ironic spirit of John Pienaar) I award this prestigious new award to The cardboard tower of Westminster.
All four ideas on my long list had aspects which ran the winner close. None of the others had quite the power to provide me with such an excruciatingly negative response than did the winner.
I welcome any feedback to LWD or @tudortweet, making a case for candidates for future awards.