Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style?

Robert Benmosche was appointed as a tough guy to do a tough job at AIG. Is such a job ‘situationally’ right for such a leadership style? To address the question, we have to take a fresh look at an old leadership theory

According to The Financial Times

Robert Benmosche has the toughest task in corporate America – keeping AIG afloat while finding some $80bn (£50bn, €56bn) to repay US taxpayers and free the insurer from government ownership. Since taking over in August , Mr Benmosche has clashed with government officials over executives’ pay, threatened to resign and halted the “fire sale of the century” – a plan to sell large chunks of the once-mighty insurer that had been blessed by the federal authorities after they first bailed out AIG in September [2008]. Mr Benmosche believes that his aggressive management style has helped stop the rot at a company that was heading for liquidation and was being lambasted by politicians for paying bonuses with federal money. He predicts it will take at least two years for AIG to sell businesses and earn enough profits to repay the government and persuade it to sell its 80 per cent stake. The authorities are not as confident. Tim Geithner, the US Treasury Secretary, recently told Congress he did not believe the government [would] be fully refunded for its largesse towards AIG. The Government Accountability Office has estimated that taxpayers will end up losing more than $30bn on the insurer.

The recent crises in financial institutions have revealed that many were led by charismatic and dominant individuals whose style in hindsight was often associated with narcissism and worse psychological characteristics. [Mandrill Management, as it has been called in earlier blogs]. There is much to be said for a direct and forceful style in times of crisis. Mr Benmosche has a chance to provide a more positive exemplar for such a style. We will follow the case carefully.

Robert Benmosche’s background

Born: 1944, Brooklyn, New York
Education: New York Military Academy; BA in Mathematics, Alfred University, NY
Career: Truck driver for Coca-Cola; two years as a lieutenant in the US Army Signal Corps. ; In 1966 worked in technology at consultancy Arthur D. Little
before joining Chase in 1979; Between 1982 and 1995 he was at Paine Webber, the brokerage house, working variously in marketing, finance, operations, human resources and sales; Moved to MetLife in 1995 as its chief executive, before retiring
in 2006. Appointed CEO of AIG in August 2009 after the corporate upheaval of the credit crunch. Hobbies: “I need to find the time to go beyond learning wine-making and jogging.”

A Note on Situational Leadership

Students of leadership will still come across the venerable theory of situational leadership. The textbook Dilemmas of Leadership traces the concept to an influential article in Harvard Business Review from the late 1950s, reprinted as a classic 25 years later. Prior to the 1950s, trait theorists had assumed there was a ‘one right way to lead organizations. By the 1950s, the older trait theories were being replaced by theories which suggested there was still a ‘one right way’, by that the ‘way’ would be influenced by context. Contingency theories have a family resemblance to situational theories. They don’t take contrasting positions. Any confusion is due more to historical differences. Contingency theories came from broader studies iof organization; situational leadership as its label implies has been limited within leadership studies, and subject to ‘appropriation’ by consultant-academics such as Hersey and Blanchard.

Situational Leadership was a movement away from earlier full-blown trait theories of ‘what leaders are’ (fixed traits) to ‘what leaders do’. There is no simple way through the ‘contingency/situational’ jungle. Rickards and Clark (Dilemmas of Leadership) suggest that any leadership theory can be studied for exploring the dilemmas which any leader has to deal with. For example, situational leadership suggests that a leader who adapts to situations may produce anxieties and lack of trust and confidence in others regarding his or her ‘authenticity’. This is a dilemma of trust in seeking the appropriate behaviours to exercise leadership influence or control.

8 Responses to Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style?

  1. Tudor says:

    Welcome to all new MBSW students. I trust that your New Year Resolutions include a commitment to read the study guides on a regular basis, to work your way through the textbook, and keep an eye on these leadership blog posts …

    Good luck for a successful course.

  2. davidburkus says:

    Interesting the way he attributes his success to an aggressive style. I would think Contingency theory would say his style is actually more ineffective. Of course, it’s entirely dependent on his position power, which begs the question of who at AIG really has control.

  3. Tudor says:

    Thanks for this. I don’t think we have had anyone sharing insights on contingency theory among regular LWD subscribers. Would be pleased to receive further contributions. Warmest regards.

  4. Paul Ballington says:

    Looking at AIG’s position, could it be argued that a strong, charismatic leader was essential to manage their major stakeholder, the US Government, otherwise a break-up and fire sale of assets, to the ultimate detriment of the more numerous small stakeholders would have been inevitable.

    I think the selection of Robert Benmosche was inspired as he can control the politicians whilst a well motivated team puts AIG back on its feet.

    I believe that the Prudential has acquired some of AIG’s Asian interests. The Pru’s shares plummetted on the anouncement of the buy, it will be interesting to see whether this was a wise move on the part of their CEO Tidjane Thiam or whether the deal will unwind without the tougher leadership of Mark Tucker, “a Chelsea fan, knew and recruited most of the Pru’s directors in the far east and was equipped with the locker-room jocularity needed to bring opposing groups together” (Phillip Inman the Guardian). Thiam on first examination looks to fit the New Leadership Model, but will he hold a deal based upon distributing leadership to a number of strong teams, and devised by Tucker?

    Are cracks already appearing?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/apr/27/aviva-prudential-break-up-shareholder

  5. Website says:

    Website…

    Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style? « Leaders We Deserve…

  6. theory organizationa…

    […]Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style? « Leaders We Deserve[…]…

  7. compare payday loan lenders…

    […]Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style? « Leaders We Deserve[…]…

  8. ofertas iphone4 , manual iphone4 ,precio iphone4,carcasa iphone4, trucos iphone4, iphone precio…

    […]Robert Benmosche: New leader, old leadership style? « Leaders We Deserve[…]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: