Murray squeaks through the first week of the French Open. But he is a quick learner as his post-match interviews show
LWD believes that leadership requires skills at figuring out what to do under tough conditions. Sport offers plenty of examples of how a player reacts to adversity and learns from it.
One way to go ‘behind the headlines’ to see whether you can detect a player’s skill at ‘reading’ a situation. I’ve taken one of Andy Murray’s post-match interviews during the French Open to show what can revealed about his map-making (sense-making) skills.
Murray v Tipsarevic
The match was interesting, if a bit ugly to watch. Tipsarevic came out determined to ‘out-ugly’ his opponent. Murray is himself building a reputation for winning ugly, maybe something he developed while working with earlier coach, Brad Gilbert, who wrote a book on the subject
In this match, the big-swinging Serb attacked powerfully enough to seize the initiative in the first set. At one stage winning rather easily. Error counts were high on both sides. Murray dug deep, and eventually won the set on a tie-break.
The mysterious momentum effect had kicked in. Murray looked a very likely winner. The end came more quickly than expected. His opponent retired after medical breaks at the end of the second set.
How did he do that?
Murray had toughed it out. He had shown similar skills in the previous round, when he turned around another match after appearing to be heading out of the tournament. So what can we learn from the performances?
The winning ugly bit was summed up by a Guardian reporter who had watched Murray train with Gilbert
As a player Gilbert’s approach was – and, as a coach, is – all about strategy, following a game plan, burrowing away, undermining the opponent’s game, getting him to unravel. In a way, though, he has fallen victim to the sound bite popularity of the book’s title, Winning Ugly. It’s not about winning by cheating or trying to gain unfair advantage, but wining despite not being blessed with a naturally beautiful game.
Murray did not get on with Gilbert, and eventually sacked him in favour of a less-qualified bunch of less abrasive acolytes. I suspect Murray is more interested in playing beautiful tennis than he would admit. On clay the beauty at the moment often comes out of desperation when he improvises outrageously when in trouble
The post-match interview
Immediate on-court interviews bring out the laconic worse of Murray. But give him time to reflect, and more interesting ideas are revealed. Here’s an interview made after the Tipsarevic match. I have added comments about Murray’s map-making or analytical skills in the interview:
It was Tipsarevic, 24, who took the initiative with some powerful hitting as Murray struggled with unforced errors in the early stages. The unseeded player broke twice in succession to move 5-2 clear but twice failed to serve out .. It came down to a tie-break and Murray dominated, sealing it with a cross-court backhand winner.
Murray broke at the start of the second set [and] Tipsarevic then called for the trainer to receive treatment on his left thigh. In a match that lacked any real rhythm the world number three immediately handed the break back, but then moved ahead again ..
The increasingly forlorn Tipsarevic now called for the doctor and swallowed some pills at the changeover but was unable to threaten as Murray, still not at his very best, did enough to wrap up the second set. That proved enough for Tipsarevic, who approached the net and shook Murray’s hand after one hour and 51 minutes.
“I didn’t see much wrong with him in the first set. He maybe slowed down his serve a little bit. It’s one of those things that can be tough sometimes when you don’t know how bad someone’s problem is or if they’re going to come out firing.”
[LWD: Murray wonders why he didn’t notice T’s injury, and why he didn’t capitalize more efficiently when it became obvious. ]
“You just fight and try to come back.. and it’s much easier on clay, you get into more rallies.
[LWD: Most players can’t or won’t offer more than a well-worn cliché. Murray ‘reads’ and ‘tests’ the map of how to recover on clay, and finds an explanation for himself, i.e. he is making his own map on winning on clay.]
“One of the things is not to panic if you go behind. One break is nothing – you can always find ways to come back.”
[LWD: more map-making. Maybe earlier matches were lost because he panicked when going behind, and didn’t have a way back, didn’t have a decent map. Now he is sketching out his own map. And it’s personal. And positive. And there is the logic that he, Murray, can find ways back because he has more ways of playing ugly, and more ways or producing the beautiful winner while doing it]
Map Reading, Map Testing and Map Making
I have been fond of the Map Making as a metaphor for Sense Making for some while. Quite a bit more can be found in the book Dilemmas of Leadership.
This example may go some way to explaining the processes applied to the development of sporting leaders such as Andy Murray and the influence of earlier map-makers such as his mentor Brad Gilbert.
Image acknowledged from the tennis blog by Paulo Cleto